Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> The Criminal Defense Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: The Criminal Defense BlogHow Reliable are Forensic and Ballistic Evidence?
By Chris
ADVERTISEMENTS
Forensic and ballistic evidence have been key to criminal convictions — and police drama — for the past few decades. But a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) could change the way these types of evidence play out in court.
At heart of the issue is that the scientific methods used to link bullets to guns and identify fingerprints, hair follicles and bite marks are far from perfect, and can seldom prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Aside from DNA evidence, no forensic evidence should be viewed as cut-and-dry.
For example, matching bullets to shells is far from an exact science, as many of the identifying marks used are too common for a one-to-one relationship. Yet ballistic evidence is often presented as such...continue to full postFull post as published by The Criminal Defense Blog on May 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

How reliable is forensic evidence
Is Forensic Evidence Used in L.A. Murder Trials Valid
Microsoft Has a New Forensic Device for Windows Computers
NRC report on forensic evidence casts further doubt on reliability of lab evidence
Can Congress Legislate Forensic Science








