Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex CrimesReading Comstock Tea Leaves
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
To show that different people take away varied impressions of the same oral argument, Doug Berman has a funny juxtaposition of two newspaper stories about the Comstock argument. The first commenter at SL&P seems to think that the government lost all but Ginsburg. I agree that Ginsburg was clearly the most government friendly, but it sounded to me like the pragmatic justifications for the law were strong enough for Kennedy and Breyer. Roberts and Alito didn't say much but I think they will continue their government-friendly votes in criminal cases. I wasn't quite sure what to make of Stevens, but I thought he was on balance supporting the government.Full post as published by Sex Crimes on January 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Fume Event
Leaves Airline Attendant Sick
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Assessing the Comstock Oral Argument
The Comstock Case, Gonzales v. Raich, and the Limits of Federal Power:
Comstock and National Security Detentions
Court Hears Arguments in Comstock








