Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex CrimesMy Prediction of the Outcome in Comstock
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
I'm probably completely wrong, but based upon the oral argument I think that this is how the Justices will vote:
Roberts: Government
Scalia: Comstock
Thomas: Comstock
Alito: Government
Kennedy: Government
Stevens: Government
Ginsburg: Government
Breyer: Government
Sotomayor: Comstock
I could see Kennedy or Stevens switching to Comstock, but I think the outcome is likely a 6 to 3 in favor of the government. As I have argued many times, I think Comstock has the better argument, but I think it is likely the precedents of Lopez and Morrison are about to fade into the past with a newly super-charged Necessary and Proper Clause. This is also consistent with my earlier prediction that the Justices would have to focus in on the Commerce Clause for Comstock to win and that just didn't happen.continue to full postFull post as published by Sex Crimes on January 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Assessing the Comstock Oral Argument
The Comstock Case, Gonzales v. Raich, and the Limits of Federal Power:
Comstock and National Security Detentions
Court Hears Arguments in Comstock








