ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Bookmark Follow Me Email to a friend

Criminal Law

: Capital Defense Weekly

Per curiam: Hedgpeth v. Pulido

By Karl R. Keys, Esq. (all)

“The United States Supreme Court issued one decision today.  In Hedgpeth v. Pulido, the Court issued a per curiam decision, with 3 justices dissenting as to the remand, in which it held that a conviction based on jury instructions containing more than one theory of guilt, where one theory is invalid, is to be judged under the harmless error standard.  The Ninth Circuit had found the error to be structural error.” [via Harmful Error] From that opinion: A conviction based on a general verdict is subject tochallenge if the jury was instructed on alternative theories of guilt and may have relied on an invalid one. See Strom-berg v. California, 283 U. S. 359 (1931); Yates v. United States, 354 U. S. 298 (1957). In this case the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that such an error is?structural error,? requiring that the conviction be set aside on collateral review without regard to whether the flaw in the instructions prejudiced the defendant...continue to full post

Full post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on December 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:


















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource









Click here






Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











Click here
0.3236 secs