Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentPA: Exclusionary rule does not apply to dentist disciplinary proceedings
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Exclusionary rule does not apply to dentist board disciplinary proceedings. The dentist's office was subjected to a search warrant for patient files. The exclusionary rule does not apply in non-criminal contexts. Kerr v. Pa. State Bd. of Dentistry, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2048 (November 19, 2008).
Defendant was illegally detained and the officer had his ID and asked for consent. Since the stop was unlawful, the consent was invalid. State v. Strader, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1712 (November 19, 2008):
Accordingly, the burden shifted to the state to establish that defendant's consent was "independent of, or only tenuously related to" the unlawful stop. Hall, 339 Or at 35. As in Highley, the request for consent to search defendant occurred in close temporal proximity to the prior illegality...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on November 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Lawsuits and Settlements
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Is the Exclusionary Rule Consistent With Originalism:
Why Does the United States Have an Exclusionary Rule:
Originalism Does Not Support an Exclusionary Rule
Response to Paul on Originalism and the Exclusionary Rule:
Kinsella, Block, Tinsley on Exclusionary Rule








