Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly

Criminal Law

: Capital Defense Weekly

Last week in October edition

By Karl R. Keys, Esq.

This week will be a double edition when it finally gets out (hopefully Monday night/Tuesday morning). Unfortunately I have three trial calls in the morning (following weeks of either trial or multiple trial calls) and have not finished nearly as much reading and research for this week’s edition. What follow excludes what appears to be a large volume of decisions from Austin, as well as from the double-check we do with Findlaw.  So far: In Favor of the Accused or Condemned (initial list) Roderick Nunley v. Bowersox, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21553 (8th Cir 10/19/2010)(unpublished) Stay upheld on claims relating to Ring. State v. Nathaniel Jackson, 2010 Ohio 5054; 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 4254 (Ohio 11th App 10/15/2010) Trial court judge “admitted in an affidavit that he enlisted prosecutorial assistance in preparing and drafting appellant’s sentencing entry but failed to include defense counsel in the process...continue to full post

Full post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on October 25, 2010 (boomark / email).