Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Defense Newsletter Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Defense Newsletter BlogGonzalez: Confrontation Clause Error Was Harmless
By Tim Cone
ADVERTISEMENTS
In Gonzalez v. Sec. Fla. Dep?t of Corrections, No. 09-15599 (Jan. 3, 2011), the Court affirmed the denial of habeas relief to a Florida inmate sentenced to death for a 1992 murder.The Court did not reach the issue whether Gonzalez? post-collateral motion in Florida State Court was ?properly filed? for purposes of tolling the federal habeas statute of limitations, and instead denied the petition on the merits.The Court rejected the argument that the Confrontation Clause error in admitting at trial the confession of Gonzalez? non-testifying co-defendants was not harmless error. The Court agreed with the Florida Supreme Court that in light of Gonzalez? own confession, and other evidence, the error in admitting this evidence was harmless.The Court also rejected the argument that the Florida state courts erroneously disallowed two of Gonzalez? peremptory challenges...continue to full postFull post as published by Defense Newsletter Blog on January 04, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Fenner on Today's Confrontation Clause
Argument preview: The Court considers the Confrontation Clause again
Yee on Scalia on the Confrontation Clause







