Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Third Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Third Circuit BlogFourth Amendment Requires Initial Determination of "Seizure"
By Candace Hom, Melinda Ghilardi, Nancy Rimmer, Sarah Gannett, Renee Pietropaolo and Tieffa Harper
ADVERTISEMENTS
In United States v. Crandell, No. 07-4004 (Jan. 29, 2009), police responded to an anonymous tip regarding a Black male with blond-tipped dreadlocks in the area carrying a handgun in his waistband. The officers apparently recognized the tip as a description of the defendant. As the officers arrived in the area, they observed the defendant walking in their direction. The officers approached the defendant and conducted a pat down search of his person.The trial court suppressed the gun as fruit of an illegal seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The court ruled that the anonymous tip was insufficient to support a reasonable suspicion to justify the stop. The trial court apparently assumed that police had seized the defendant when they initiated the pat down search...continue to full postFull post as published by Third Circuit Blog on February 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Lawsuits and Settlements
State Farm Undercompensation
alleging compensation for totaled vehicles is less than California law requires.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Minor interference with property did not state a Fourth Amendment claim
Cuddihy's Definitive Analysis of the Fourth Amendment
Unintended v. intended consequences of police officer firing a gun
Bah. I Didn't Really Care for the Fourth Amendment Anyway








