Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> StandDown Texas Project
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: StandDown Texas ProjectAs Executions Resume, So Do Questions of Fairness
By standdown
ADVERTISEMENTS
That's the title of an article in Wednesday's New York Times reported by Shaila Dewan from North Carolina. LINKThe release of the third death row inmate in six months in North
Carolina last week is raising fresh questions about whether states are
supplying capital-murder defendants with adequate counsel, even as an
execution on Tuesday night in Georgia ended a seven-month national
suspension.
In all three cases, North Carolina appeals courts found that
evidence that would have favored the defendants was withheld from
defense lawyers by prosecutors or investigators. In two of the cases,
including that of Levon Jones, who was released on Friday after 14
years on death row, the courts said the defendants? lawyers had failed
to mount an adequate defense...continue to full postFull post as published by StandDown Texas Project on May 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

As Executions Resume, So Do Questions of Fairness
Executions Resume, as Do Questions of Fairness
"As Executions Resume, So Do Questions of Fairness"
Some US states to resume executions after high court lethal injection ruling









