Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Kansas Federal Defender
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Kansas Federal DefenderDiscretion Exercised the Right Way
By Melody Evans and Kirk Redmond
ADVERTISEMENTS
Discretion exercised the right way means, of course, a below-guideline sentence that stands up on appeal. The government cried foul when the district court imposed a year-and-a-day sentence rather than the 4-plus years called for by the guideline for transporting heroin, in US v. Munoz-Nava (apologies, I don't know how to type a tilde). Here are some of the factors credited by the sentencing court:It looked to his long and consistent work history, community support, and lack of a felony criminal record, concluding ?[t]he court has received a large number of letters from community members, family members, and from defendant?s employers, in support of the defendant, and attesting to his responsibility, his work ethic. These letters indicate that this offense was highly out of character for this defendant...continue to full postFull post as published by Kansas Federal Defender on May 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CA1: unless discretion is exercised, the court can't review the discretion
Reversal based on improper shackling before jury [NOT FINAL]
New piece on federal prosecutorial discretion
Curative instructions and mistrial motions
NSW Tribunal limits criteria for public interest disclosure








