ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogConsecutive Sentencing Discretion Affirmed
By Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. O'Bryan, 2008 WL 905189 (4/4/08) (unpub'd) - The Tenth affirms that district courts have discretion in deciding whether to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences. However, in deciding to address the concurrent sentencing discretion issue as though it had been preserved, the 10th contrasts the latest plain error sentencing cases with a possibly helpful published case: U.S. v. Tisdale, 248 F.3d 964 (10th Cir. 2001). In that case, the 10th held the defendant preserved his claim that the district court did not understand its authority to impose a concurrent sentence when, after the district court announced a consecutive sentence, the defendant reminded the district court he was serving a state sentence and asked for a concurrent sentence.continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on April 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

More on the cool Ice grant and consecutive sentencing Blakely issue
School Discretion in Limiting Student Religious Expression is Affirmed
Consecutive Sentences and the Right to a Jury Trial
Another great read on the state of federal sentencing







