ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyCircuit courts say the darndest things
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
I make an effort to read just about every published federal appellate ruling dealing with sentencing issues, and sometimes this effort rewards me with amazing nuggets of wisdom from circuit judges. For example, I learned something new about the US Constitution from the final paragraph of the Eleventh Circuit's work today in US v. Aldrich, No. 08-15556 (11th Cir. April 27, 2009) (available here). Specifically, thanks to Aldrich, I now know that "[t]here is no constitutionally significant difference between masturbating in front of a minor in person versus doing so via web camera."Full post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on April 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

U.S. Judge: Pro Bono Is Antisocial
Clients do the darndest things.
Nordlinger: Presidents say the darndest things, c.
2nd Cir. Judge: Pro Bono Is Antisocial
Little old ladies say the darndest things.








