ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Third Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Third Circuit BlogCircuit affirms denial of motion to suppress, but finds "possession in connection with another felony" enhancement applied in error
By Candace Hom, Melinda Ghilardi, Nancy Rimmer, Sarah Gannett, Renee Pietropaolo and Tieffa Harper
ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. Hester, No. 16-3570, 2018 WL 6259314 (3d Cir. Nov. 30, 2018)In this felon-in-possession of a firearm case, the Third Circuit affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress, but held that application of a sentencing enhancement for possession in connection with another felony was erroneous. Hester was a passenger in a car parked illegally in front of a corner store in Newark, New Jersey, at approximately 11:40 p.m. Police observed the driver enter the corner store, which had a known history of narcotics sales. When the driver returned to the car, a marked police car pulled up along the driver's side of the car, and an unmarked car pulled up behind it. The officers approached both sides of the car on foot, one approached the driver?s side window; three others approached and stood at the passenger's side of the vehicle...continue to full postFull post as published by Third Circuit Blog on December 04, 2018 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Crime Categories
How you can tell a misdemeanor from a felony.
Lawsuits and Settlements
Daniel V. Leccese Sr.
$250,000 fine for felony mail fraud.
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Male Enhancement Products
Recalled Nationwide by Nature & Health
Walt Disney
alleging a Sikh American applied for a job with Disney but was told he did not have the "Disney look" - apparently referring to his beard and turban, which is required by his religion.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









