Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCA11: Defendant should have been permitted to participate in co-defendant's suppression hearing, but here there was no prejudice
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
While it is “troubling” that this defendant was denied an opportunity to participate in the suppression hearing, there was no error in denying his motion to suppress on Franks grounds because there was an alternative ground to support the search. United States v. Gamory, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4764 (11th Cir. March 11, 2011).*
Defendant was illegally detained, but the search warrant issued later was not the product of the detention. It was based on an independent source. United States v. Fitzgerald, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4797 (4th Cir. March 10, 2011) (unpublished):
In plaintiff’s civil case against the search of his property, he made no showing that the magistrate issuing the warrant was not neutral and detached such that the warrant could not be relied on by the executing officers...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on March 14, 2011 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

A criminal defendant's testimony at a suppression hearing may not be used against him at trial.
Grant of New Trial Based on Erroneous Admission of Testimony Affirmed
Plaintiff Avoids Proposal for Settlement by Dismissing Without Prejudice
Life Sentence for Drug Defendant Affirmed; Speedy Trial Act, Other Arguments Rejected
Gordon: Counsel not ineffective in failure to insist on allocution









