ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime and ConsequencesBlog Scan
By Kent Scheidegger et al.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Forensic Evidence in Criminal Trials: David Bernstein at Volokh Conspiracy posted some comments on the use of forensic evidence in criminal trials and Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702. Bernstein discusses how expert witness testimony is supported by "Political Liberals" who oppose a crack down on the use of expert testimony and ignored "the ongoing abuses of expert testimony in the criminal justice system." These "ongoing abuses" are the very things mentioned in the Petitioner's Brief for Certiorari, and the Amicus in Support of the Petitioner, in the upcoming Supreme Court case Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts. The case will be argued next term. It will be interesting to see if the Court takes a position that is similar to Bernstein's...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime and Consequences on May 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Reduce bloated PDFs with ease.
Miese Scan-Qualität der Bielefelder Aufklärungszeitschriften
#^%$&* Scanner, Or Hints From Heloise
Delayed Brain Scan Leads to Damages Award








