Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Judging Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Judging Crimes408. Conventions
By Joel Jacobsen
ADVERTISEMENTS
It's hard for any professional to question the conventional wisdom of his or her field. It's hard even to perceive the things one takes for granted. The tendency is easiest to see in fields in which one has no emotional or financial investment, such as medicine.
In Seed, Dave Munger writes: "placebos by definition have no medical effect." He's paraphrasing this belligerent post by the MD blogger Peter Lipson, who claims to genuinely believe he's delivering "a serious smackdown." But both pieces demonstrate that, according to standard ways of measuring things, placebos do have a measurable medical effect.
What the bloggers mean is: placebos, by definition, have no pharmacological effect. They're proceeding from the assumption that something made up to look like a pharmacological agent can have no medical effect through any mechanism other than pharmacology...continue to full postFull post as published by Judging Crimes on November 15, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Publication: Collection of Hague Conventions
Geneva Conventions 60th Anniversary
"Conventions blend money, parties, ethics rules"
Presidential Nominating Conventions and the Establishment Clause An Analysis







