Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomOfficers and the Business Judgment Rule
By J. Robert Brown
Directors have the benefit of the over-inclusive protection of the business judgment rule. Whether the same presumption applies to officers, who operate under delegated authority, is a surprisingly contentious and unresolved issue. For one very nice exegesis on the subject, take a look at Lyman Johnson and David Millon's paper, Recalling Why Corporate Officers Are Fiduciaries. The post by Chris Erskine examines a case out of New York that concluded the business judgment rule does apply to officers.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on April 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Bankrupt Money Manager
Former officers to pay $10.7 million settlement in fraud lawsuit.
City and Mayor Whistleblower
Two officers awarded part of $8 million whistleblower settlement.
Express Scripts Inc.
Over $9.5 million payout in deceptive business practices lawsuit.
FedEx
Ground Business Model Wins Class Action in Washington
Business Lawsuit
Elbit Imaging Ltd. agrees to pay CP Holdings Ltd. a $5 million settlement.
Personal Business
Jundts to pay $1.8 million settlement in debts lawsuit.

Business Associations Limerick of the Week: Kamin
Allen on the the Business Judgment Rule
The UCL and the "business judgment rule": Hill v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.
Allen on Modern Corporate Governance
Officers and Directors Not Considered "Passive" under Rule 13d
The Fiduciary Duties of Directors of Troubled Companies: Emerging Clarity








