Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance BlogImplications of the AIG Bonus Imbroglio
By Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance
(Editor’s note: This post is based on a client memorandum by A. Richard Susko, Arthur H. Kohn and Mary E. Alcock of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.)
Great outrage and indignation have been expressed, from multiple perspectives, in connection with AIG?s retention bonuses and the Congressional response thereto. Now that most of the public, albeit probably not the actual participants, seem to be past the initial burst of emotion, we believe that it is well worth noting that all employers, whether or not they are recipients of Government funds, should pay close attention to the several recently proposed (and competing) bills in Congress spawned by the episode.
These bills show that the politics of populist furor over executive compensation can easily pave the way for hasty and thoughtless regulation, which would (if enacted as written) be counterproductive to the US financial system and economic recovery. The bills also foreshadow possible future and potentially broad legislation that may eventually have negative effects for many companies beyond the financial industry.
Political focus on, and accompanying rhetoric regarding, perceived excesses in executive compensation have been building in intensity for some time. The current legislative impulses, however, raise systemic risks that pose a far greater danger than the issues sought to be addressed by them. In our recent memorandum, entitled “Implications of the AIG Bonus Imbroglio,” we discuss particularly troublesome aspect of the four recently proposed bills, including the lack of an exception for existing binding compensation contracts. The memorandum also outlines possibly unintended and negative consequences to employers, employees and the public alike of the bills and briefly summarizes relevant provisions of each of the bills.
Whatever the immediate prospects for passage may be, we believe that it is important for employers and employees generally to be aware of the substance of the recent proposals even if they are not the targets at the moment.
The memorandum is available here.
Full post as published by The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog on April 18, 2009 (boomark / email).

A bonus! An extra listing about posts on bonus arrangements with law firms
Shell and BP "Retention Bonuses"
AIGs Bonus Bonanza: Will the Government Get Its Money Back







