ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Truth on the Market

More backdating detritus

ADVERTISEMENTS

I’ve written (e.g.) about the misguided criminal prosecutions spawned by the backdating so-called scandal.  WSJ’s Holman Jenkins, who has been on the story from the beginning, echoes these sentiments, emphasizing the real scandal of the prosecutorial misconduct spawned by backdating:

it’s . . . hard not to see the self-interested ethics of the plaintiff’s bar spilling across the entire legal profession. In their official roles, prosecutors invent Kafkaesque new ways to ensnare the unpopular wealthy in legal trouble, then jump to private law firms and make seven-figure livings protecting the wealthy from the monster they themselves unleashed. Shakespeare had a solution, but, alas, this would also be illegal. Thus it must fall to bloggers, the media and judges like Judge Wright to protect Americans from overzealous prosecutors.

Amen.  In our condemnation let us not forget about those plaintiffs’ lawyers.  They’ve been responsible for less human suffering here, and some general arguments can be made for the disciplinary effect of civil litigation.  But no assessment of civil litigation’s role is complete without considering the agency costs of plaintiffs’ lawyers. 

Consider the recent endgame in the Apple backdating litigation. The lawyers did come up with $16.5 million settlement.  But, as if to demonstrate that fiduciary problems are everywhere, the settlement diverted $2.5 million to “corporate governance” programs of three law schools. Two of the schools were affiliated with lead plaintiffs’ lawyers.  Beyond that, one wonders what effect the money would have on the schools’ teaching and research about litigation’s role in corporate governance.

Ted Frank’s Center for Class Action Fairness has embarrassed the parties into at least giving Apple shareholders an opportunity to get that money, and is now asking for a guarantee that the shareholders will get the entire settlement. Here’s the story.


Filed under: corporate crime, option timing scandal

Full post as published by Truth on the Market on November 17, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 11:30:21)