Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael GeistCRTC Releases Broadcast Review Decision
By Michael Geist
- rejects (again) the request from over-the-air broadcasters for a new fee-for-carriage payment (ie. payment for over-the-air signals).
- establishes a new fund for local programming that will cost cable and satellite subscribers about 50 cents per month. The new fund sparked two dissenting opinions.
- concludes that time shifting (in this case carrying multiple versions of the same network) should be compensated and calls for negotiations to establish a price.
- continues to move toward greater deregulation by dropping regulation for smaller broadcast distribution companies (under 20,000 subscribers), removing "genre protection" in competitive areas (which for the moment are sports and news), and provides greater flexibility in packaging channels.
- opens the door to new forms of targeted advertising (ie. closer examination of viewing profiles and interests) with a hearing on the matter scheduled for next year.
While this suggests a mixed bag, it ultimately leaves consumers paying more (the new fund and time shifting fees), though not quite as much as some broadcasters were hoping for. Interestingly, the Internet and new forms of broadcast scarcely merit a mention in the entire decision with those issues slated for review in the new media hearings next February.
Update: A Canadian Press reporter asked for my views on whether today's decision would change broadcasting in Canada by 2011. My response:
The decision does very little to significantly reshape the Canadian broadcasting framework. Indeed, while the Commission is tinkering at the regulatory edges, the Internet and new technologies are driving far more dramatic change in the way that creators distribute content and Canadians access it. Broadcasting will look different in 2011, but not because of this decision. The rush of technology and the emergence of the Internet and wireless as platforms for distributing content are fundamentally altering the landscape and today's decision is a reminder that the CRTC is an increasingly marginalized player on those issues.
Full post as published by Michael Geist on October 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
Wrinkle-Fillers
FDA to Review Labeling due to Adverse Event Reports

CRTC to look into broadcasting and new media
CRTC Net Neutraltiy and Throttling Decision Tomorrow
CRTC sides with Bell on throttling complaint - but will consider net neutrality later
Adequacy of Reasons in CRTC Throttling Decision
CRTC hearings on broadcasting and new media
Follow the CRTC new media hearings
CRTC announces hearings on New Media
CRTC throttling / network neutrality submissions
CRTC To Face Net Neutrality Issue as CAIP Demands Bell Cease and Desist Its Throttling Practices
What's Wrong With Broadcast Journalism: One Commentator's View









