Consumer Law

New Hoofnagle Piece on Identity Theft

By Jeff Sovern

Chris Hoofnagle of Berkeley has been an important theorist on identity theft.  He has a new piece out attempting to implement his theories.  Here's the abstract:

There is no reliable way for consumers, regulators, and businesses to assess the relative incidence of identity fraud at major financial institutions. This lack of information prevents more vigorous competition among institutions to protect accountholders from identity theft. As part of a multiple strategy approach to obtaining more actionable data on identity theft, the Freedom of Information Act was used to obtain complaint data submitted by victims in 2006 to the Federal Trade Commission. This complaint data identifies the institution where impostors established fraudulent accounts or affected existing accounts in the name of the victim. The data show that some institutions have a far greater incidence of identity theft than others. The data further show that the major telecommunications companies had numerous identity theft events, but a metric is lacking to compare this industry with the financial institutions.

This is a first attempt to meaningfully compare institutions on their performance in avoiding identity theft. This analysis faces several challenges that are described in the methods section. The author welcomes constructive criticism, suggestions, and comments in an effort to shine light on the identity theft problem (choofnagle@law.berkeley.edu).

You can download it at http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=bclt. 

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on February 27, 2008 (boomark / email).