ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Alabama Consumer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: Alabama Consumer Blog

Fantastic Award In FDCPA Case Against Credigy

By M. Stan Herring

ADVERTISEMENTS

Debt collectors and their lawyers almost always take the approach that its "no big deal" that the collection agency violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Read this fascinating story here about what happened to one famous debt collector (Credigy) who did not take its wrongdoing seriously and instead attacked the plaintiffs and their children.

Several excellent consumer lawyers tried a case against Credigy for nine days in Northern California and the jury awarded $500,000 in damages. Attorney fees and expenses will be added to this outstanding result.

Here is the result but definitely read the entire article at Denise Richardson's blog:

Following a nine day trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the jury returned a verdict of $500,000 against Credigy Services Corporation. The verdict consisted of $100,000 in actual damages and $400,000 in punitive damages. United States District Judge James W. Ware, who presided over the trial, specifically instructed the jury that they could only award punitive damages, if they found by clear and convincing evidence that Credigy Services Corporation "was malicious or in reckless disregard of the rights" of the Fausto's. In order to be "malicious, the jury had to find that the conduct was accompanied by ill will, spite or for the purpose of injuring another. Reckless disregard required a finding of a complete indifference to the rights of others.

We are informed that the verdict is the largest under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act on behalf of a consumer who owed the debt. The Fausto's are entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs as prevailing party under federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the California Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Congratulations to the following lawyers who represented the plaintiffs in this important case:
David Humphreys and Luke Wallace of Humphreys Wallace Humphreys, P.C. Tulsa, OK; Balám Letona, Santa Cruz, CA and Ron Wilcox, San Jose, CA.

Full post as published by Alabama Consumer Blog on April 18, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0031 secs (from cache 11/04/26 02:12:55)