Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005CAFA Stole Their Lunch Money and Ran!
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Concophillips, No. CV 08-2068PSG(FFMx), 2009 WL 1652975 (C.D. Cal. June 11, 2009).
Never underestimate the allure of the lunch lady. USW union workers filed a class action lawsuit alleging that the defendant skimped on lunch periods in violation of California law. The defendants tried removal based on CAFA, but CAFA stole their lunch money and ran.
On motion for remand, the hungry plaintiffs argued that CAFA jurisdiction failed because the Court had denied their class certification. Further, the amount in controversy requirement was not satisfied and the case did not involve 100 class members.
Setting out the CAFA jurisdiction standard, the Court explained that there was no 'reasonably foreseeable possibility' that the plaintiffs' class would be certified since they had already made two unsuccessful attempts at certification. The Court explained, ' a determination that class certification is not a ‘reasonably foreseeable possibility' is not a post-removal change in jurisdictional facts, but rather equivalent to finding that jurisdiction never existed under CAFA in the first place.'
Next, the defendant, perhaps on an empty stomach, tried removal based on supplemental and diversity jurisdiction. The defendant argued that the Court could exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims even if the federal claims having original jurisdiction had been dismissed. The defendant's argument, however, failed since there were never any federal claims asserted in the lawsuit.
Finally, the defendant argued that complete diversity existed. The Court denied this argument since, for diversity purposes, the citizenship of a union is the citizenship of all of its members. Removal failed and longer lunches prevailed.
Full post as published by CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on August 18, 2009 (boomark / email).
LA Weight Loss
Recalls LA Hot Drinks Café Au Lait
Money Mart Canada
Settles Class Action for $100 Million
Treasurer Embezzlement
Mary Lou Puccio repays Warren Cheer and Pom Program $26,000 after stealing money.
Bankrupt Money Manager
Former officers to pay $10.7 million settlement in fraud lawsuit.
Transit Technicians Scam
Two Municipal Transportation Agency agree to pay $287,000 settlement for stealing money from fare boxes.
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.

Pet Stole Owner Forced to Pay Damages and Costs to Thief Who Stole his Money
I never said she stole my money
Valerie Frankel, Thin Is The New Happy
MPs say give us back the money we stole from you









