Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bankruptcy
: Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney BlogUnequal Under the Law
By Joseph McDaniel, Esq.
In fact, Congress could abolish all bankruptcy law in the United States, entirely, and probably preempt the states from building their own.
But I digress, as I often do.
Today's discussion has to do with the irritation I feel about different treatment under bankruptcy laws being available to different people, for no good reason whatsoever (that is, a stupid law, with no relationship to the goals to be achieved).
Now, pre-2005 Amendments, the Bankruptcy Code was to a large extent a level playing field for debtors. Sure, you needed regular income to file a Chapter 13, and if your debts were higher than the limits at 11 USC 109, you couldn't file a Chapter 13 at all (or you might need to file a Chapter 20).
But now, I get to talk to honest debtors with overwhelming debt who are treated differently because of the means test. One debtor who makes a quarter of a million a year, who has primarily business debt, gets to file a Chapter 7, and get on with his life.
Another, with primarily consumer debt, might very well not have that option.
That distinction under the means test makes no sense.
And if anybody asks, no, there was substantially no abuse under the pre-2005 Amendments; NOBODY in their right mind ever filed a Chapter 7 for fun. And to the extent that anybody ever did file and treat the process in a frisky or funky way, the Bankruptcy Judges were more than capable of fixing their little red wagons!
So the 2005 Amendments, sometimes referred to as the BARF Act, will always be to me a solution in search of a problem.
Full post as published by Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog on March 17, 2010 (boomark / email).

Baker on Stuntz on Unequal Justice
Communication Can Help With Unequal Distributions
"And Unequal Justice for Some"
The Unequal Geographic Burden of Federal Taxation
Terry: Separate and Still Unequal Taxing California Registered Domestic Partners








