Bankruptcy

Some hypothetical examples may be helpful:

1. Assume that a complaint alleges that a document was signed on a certain date by a certain individual. The options for an answer under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7008 are generally ?Admit? (if the date and individual are correctly identified), or ?Deny? (if they are not), or ?The party lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegation? (if that is true). A response stating that ?the document speaks for itself? is not part of this rule.

2. If there is a request to admit that a document contains quoted language, the alternatives contemplated by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7036 are to (a) do nothing within the required time frame (in which case the matter is admitted), (b) object to the request (stating legally sufficient grounds to support the objection), or (c) answer the request. If the responding party answers, the options are ?Admit? (if the quotation is accurate), ?Deny? (if the quotation is not accurate), give a qualified response (in good faith), or state that the party cannot truthfully admit or deny the request, giving detailed reasons in support. See KeyBank Natl?l Assoc. v. Mann (In re Mann), 220 B.R. 351, 357 (Bankr. N.D.Ohio 1998). ?The document speaks for itself? does not fall into any of these categories.

3. If counsel asks a witness to read a document out loud during a hearing, there is no objection in the Federal Rules of Evidence called ?the document speaks for itself.? A witness, with the court?s permission, may always read from a document during an evidentiary hearing or trial.

There are a number of cases and articles that address this issue. Counsel may want to review them to avoid the temptation of writing or saying ?the document speaks for itself.?

As always, your cooperation in considering this issue is appreciated.