ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Appellate Law and Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Appellate Law and Practice

CA1: unpreserved Kimbrough errors are reviewed for plain error

By S. COTUS

ADVERTISEMENTS

US v. Matos, No. 07-1459 holds that there was no plain error in failing to consider the unreasonableness of a guidelines crack sentence. However, post-Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007), the First says that the defendant must ?demonstrate a reasonable probability that he would have received a more lenient sentence had the district court considered the crack to powder cocaine disparity when sentencing Defendant.?

Full post as published by Appellate Law and Practice on July 10, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 10/31/26 05:06:05)