ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Appellate Law and Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Appellate Law and Practice

CA1: OSHA was right ? they could have turned off the power lines

By S. COTUS

ADVERTISEMENTS

Harry C. Crooker & v. OSHRC, No. 07-2770.  This case begins when OSHA determines that a live wire is too close to a bulldozer.  The construction company says that it would be infeasible to comply.  But, as an evidentiary matter, the First points out that they could have just shut down the power lines, and the reasons give for not doing that were inadequate.  Whatever the case, there is a discussion of ?infeasibility? under OSHA regs. 

To me, this case sound like such common sense, and the fine was minimal.

Full post as published by Appellate Law and Practice on August 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 13:16:55)