ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Jorda on Trade Secrets

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Jorda on Trade Secrets

Are trade secrets nothing but ?baby patents??

ADVERTISEMENTS
Are trade secrets nothing but ?baby patents?? After incredibly derogatory and defamatory statements about trade secrets, which I have heard in the past, such as, ?trade secrets don?t have a single redeeming virtue? from a corporate chief IP counsel and ?trade secrets are the cesspool of the patent system? from a Washington, DC IP professor, comes the dismissive statement that trade secrets are nothing but ?baby patents?. This opinion was expressed in a recent meeting, which I attended, of West Legalworks in New York City on ?Advanced Strategies for Cultivating, Exploiting, Tracking and Protecting Your Intellectual Property,? by the moderator of a Roundtable Discussion on ?Choosing the Optimal IP Strategy for Your Company?. As I cover trade secrets, trade secret licensing and hybrid patent/trade secret licensing in my Technology Licensing course, it occurred to me that this ?baby patent? comment would be a good problem for the final exam in this course on December 13, 2007. I asked the students to write a brief essay on whether this statement is a correct or an incorrect characterization of trade secrets. And the students had a ball with this exam problem, to say the least. All but three students out of 79 disagreed with this characterization, labeling it a very narrow or simplistic view, or an oversimplification or even a mischaracterization or serious misconception. Some called it incorrect, incomplete, inadequate or even woefully inadequate or totally or blatantly incorrect or flat wrong. One allowed as how it was a ?misnomer of gargantuan proportion.? The three students who opined that this characterization was correct did so by pointing to Mark Halligan?s statement that ?all patents are born as trade secrets,? that trade secrets are a very important IP category in their own right and that patents and trade secrets fully complement one another.

Full post as published by Jorda on Trade Secrets on January 07, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 02:48:56)