Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Securities Law Prof Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Securities Law Prof BlogSupreme Court Unanimously Rules No Bright-Line Rule of Statistical Significance in Matrixx
By Securites Lawprof
Full post as published by Securities Law Prof Blog on March 22, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Matrixx Initiatives Inc.,
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Air Line Bankruptcy
BCI Aircraft Leasing agrees to pay $600,000 settlement related to Delta Air Lines bankruptcy claims.
Merger Agreement Rejected
Finish Line and Genesco reach $175 million settlement in merger dispute.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Following Up on Matrixx v. Siracusano
Should Statistical Significance = Materiality
The Matrixx of Materiality and Statistical Significance in Securities Fraud Cases
Matrixx v. Siracusano: The Opinion is In
More on the Materiality of Statistical Significance








