Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Essentially Contested America
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Essentially Contested AmericaReferenda & Democracy
By Robert Justin Lipkin
ADVERTISEMENTS
Check out the following commentary on Ireland's rejection of the Lisbon Treaty. . . . "The Irish No provides Europe with an opportunity to rethink its
approach to referendums. Ever since Napoleon initiated the modern
practice two centuries ago, referendums
have been one-shot affairs --
the people going to the polls to say Yes or No without taking
preliminary steps to deliberate together on the choices facing the
nation. . . . This populist method is unworthy of a modern democracy.
If an issue is important enough to warrant decision by the people as a
whole, it is important enough to require a more deliberate approach to
decision-making. If the Irish return to the polls next year to rethink
their vote, they should be encouraged to engage in a more deliberative
exercise. Two weeks before the next referendum, Ireland should hold a
special national day of deliberation at which ordinary citizens discuss
the key issues at community centres throughout the country. . . . Suppose,
for example, that deliberation day begins with a familiar sort of
televised debate between the leading spokesman for the Yes and No
sides. After the television show, local citizens take charge as they
engage in the main issues in small discussion groups of 15 and larger
plenary assemblies. The small groups begin where the televised debate
leaves off. Each group spends an hour defining questions that the
national spokesmen left unanswered. Everybody then proceeds to a
plenary assembly to hear their questions answered by local
representatives of the Yes and No sides." Continue reading here.Should democracy be understood as a system of government based on populist, direct, and majoritarian self-rule? Or instead should it be understood as deliberative democracy or republican democracy? Should self-government consist of counting heads or should it instead consist of counting thoughtful heads?
Full post as published by Essentially Contested America on June 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Bolivia voters in two more states approve autonomy measures in referenda
Fourth of July Reading: Is It Time to Reboot Democracy
Ruthann Robson on Sexual Democracy
Book Announcement: Democracy Incorporated by Wolin








