Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: ConglomerateRational Choice or Behavioral Law and Economics?
By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring
While there are behavioral biases in entrepreneurial finance ? e.g., entrepreneurs are overconfident and VCs fall prey to the availability heuristic ? they don?t seem as prevalent as in public securities markets, or at least don?t lend themselves to the same calls for regulatory reform. Still, with recent notable works like Nudge and thought-provoking posts like this one from Josh Wright (on Jones v. Harris), it?s hard not to spend some time figuring out into which camp ? rational choice or behavioral law and economics ? you more firmly plant your flag.
The behavioral camp has much to offer. But several observations made by others persuade me not to dip my toes too deep into the behavioral waters. Here?s a quick list:
--Regulatory responses are challenging because different individuals have different biases, and even the same individual may have competing biases that negate each other;
--While individuals have biases, so do regulators (see Choi & Pritchard comparing the biases of investors with those at the SEC);
--The rational choice model works pretty well most of the time (and critics sometimes seem to forget that it?s only meant as a model, not a full-on reflection of the real world); and
--Taking into account behavioral biases in policy prescriptions removes incentives for correction. Tom Ulen has a nice discussion of this in a short article at 10 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 177, 179-80 (2006) (it doesn?t appear to be on SSRN). There he differentiates between our ?software? biases that can be corrected, including the entertaining Monty Hall three-door problem, and our ?hardware? biases that are much harder to correct. Regulatory responses seem more appropriate for hardware biases, education for software biases.
There are also persuasive critiques of the rational choice model, and they get a lot of play these days. But regulatory responses based on the behavioral model are far from easy or perfect, and rational choice has proved highly instructive in my work on sophisticated entrepreneurial parties. I for one am not ready to toss it out just yet.
Full post as published by Conglomerate on September 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
Food Dyes Linked to Behavioral Problems
Ban Urged
Westinghouse
alleging that former Westinghouse employees are being deprived of a choice in health care prescription plan benefits that were formerly available to them through union bargaining.

Happiness Research and Legal Scholarship.
The rational-choice model of economists as a framework for understanding legal departments
Behavioral Economics and the Federal Trade Commission
Fed staff reads behavioral economics literature








