Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: ConglomerateElectronic Comunications and Shareholder Rights
By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring
Shareholder activists were no doubt disappointed with the SEC's recent decision to reject proxy access for shareholder nominated candidates. However, the latest SEC rules facilitating communications among shareholders over the Internet could boost shareholders' power in important ways. Indeed, the SEC's most recent rules on shareholder forums make it easier for shareholders to communicate using the Internet by exempting participation in such forums from most of the proxy rules so long as certain conditions are met. The SEC hopes that the rules will promote greater use of Internet communications, and in so doing "better vindicate shareholders' state law rights." Indeed, greater use of the Internet for shareholder forums not only should enable shareholders to more effectively communicate with one another, but also should allow shareholders to assess the sentiments of their fellow shareholders on a variety of policy issues including, of course, the relative effectiveness of officers and directors. In this regard, electronic shareholder forums also may enhance shareholders' ability to wage voting campaigns. Given the increased adoption of majority voting systems (according to Claudia Allen's most recent study, some 66% of S&P 500 companies and 57% of Fortune 500 companies have embraced some form of majority voting), the ability to wage more effective voting campaigns could have a significant influence on election outcomes. Hence, while these rules certainly do not substitute for proxy access, they nevertheless could have a tremendous impact on shareholders' ability to impact corporate affairs.
Full post as published by Conglomerate on January 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
FDA
Warns About Electronic Cigarettes
MEMC Electronic Materials Inc
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Polaris All-Terrain Vehicles
Defective Electronic Control Modules
Electronic Data Systems Corp.
allegedly failed to pay employee overtime.

Shareholder Rights in Historical Perspective
DRAG-ALONG RIGHTS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN
Electronic Arts’ Attempt to Exclude my Precatory Shareholder Proposal
Shareholder Rights Plans: Adding Derivatives to "Beneficial Ownership"
Bebchuks Electronic Arts Proposal: A Critique









