Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBentele on Comparative Constitutionalism in South Africa
By Lawrence Solum
Ursula Bentele (Brooklyn Law School) has posted Mining for Gold: The Constitutional Court of South Africa's Experience with Comparative Constitutional Law on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Despite a long history of referring to foreign law in its opinions, the Supreme Court's recent citations to such sources have caused heated controversy. Critics warn of threats to sovereignty as well as serious flaws in the way judges use outside authority. Largely missing from this debate is any probing examination of the actual practice of engaging with foreign authorities. This article attempts to fill the empirical void by analyzing closely one court that has used foreign law extensively: the Constitutional Court of South Africa.
The author conducted interviews with eight former and current justices who discussed both the value gained from the practice of engaging with foreign law and their ways of addressing the concerns expressed by American critics. Whether identifying universal norms, engaging in a dialogue to help clarify an issue, or gaining insight into comparable constitutional provisions, these justices see clear benefits from exploring the opinions of constitutional courts in other parts of the world. Yet they approach such outside sources with great care, fully aware of the potential hazards of transplanting foreign legal concepts and conscientiously avoiding selective citation only to favorable outside authorities. Detailed analysis is provided of several cases containing significant references to foreign law, along with commentary from the justices on how particular opinions were enriched by examination of other courts' treatment of the same issues. These findings bear on the current debate and, in a world where many other high courts engage in constitutional comparativism, suggest that the United States Supreme Court would do well by joining the conversation.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on July 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
South Carolina Firm
Recalls Frozen Meat and Poultry Products

Thick Instrumentalism and Comparative Constitutionalism: The Case of Gay Rights
Assessing Excessive Pricing: The Case of Flat Steel in South Africa
"U.S. seeks shutdown of South Africa case"
CFP: International Conference on Feminist Constitutionalism
call for proposals for APPEAL's South Africa conference








