ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Who Should Bear the Cost of the Bandwidth Hog?

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Sunday's NYT, an article reported that Time Warner, Comcast and AT&T were all pursuing strategies aimed at curbing so-called bandwidth hogs -- Internet users whose high-volume usage threatens to slow down everyone's Internet experience.  The Internet companies like to frame the problem as a free rider problem -- if everyone pays the same price for unlimited Internet usage, then a few MMORPG enthusiasts who also download movies and video clog up the works for those who just want to check email and get directions.  Users tend to fall into two, disparate camps:  using Internet for checking weather, headlines and email uses less than 5 gigabytes a month.  However, downloading one movie uses 5 gigabytes by itself.  So, it makes sense to charge varying amounts depending on usage, just like electricity, water, long distance, cell phones usage, etc. 

Except that I don't think electricity and telephones are good analogies.  The electric company provides power and also delivers it.  When you pay for the usage of electricity, part of that is for the infrastructure used to deliver it, but also part of your charge is for the actual product:  power.  When you download a movie from Netflix, your internet provider is someone different.  You have a merchant on the one hand and a delivery service on the other.  The burden of that delivery is borne by the internet provider, who has to come up with a way to charge you for it.  The internet provider would really be happy if you didn't download that movie.  (For example, Comcast's strategy is to slow down the Internet for bandwidth hogs, incentivizing less usage.)  But the merchant, Netflix, will not be happy with that result.  So, if internet providers begin charging "by the byte," then the online merchants who want to sell you products that must be delivered via the internet (music, TV, video, news, books) will lose business as the delivery charge rises.  As consumers feel incentivized to ration their own Internet usage, then online providers will feel the pinch.

So, here's my prediction.  Online providers such as Netflix, iTunes and television companies will borrow from one of two models.  One may be "free shipping," a la Amazon and Zappos.  The second may be something like the "toll free number," which allowed consumers to call out-of-town businesses back when long distance was almost prohibitively expensive. 

Full post as published by Conglomerate on June 17, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:52:42)