ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog

Alison LaCroix, "Commandeering Federalism"

ADVERTISEMENTS

Yesterday, Assistant Professor of Law Alison LaCroix published a guest post over at Balkinization. The first couple of paragraphs are below, and you can read the entire post here (you may also be interested in listening to Prof. LaCroix discuss federalism in the context of the push for states' rights on the University of Utah's public radio station).

What light can the history of federalism shed on modern-day constitutional debates? Quite a lot ? beginning with the important point that the search for the ?real? federalism may in fact be a misguided quest. This is not to say that the idea of federalism is simply an empty shell or a rhetorical flourish devoid of content. But an understanding of American federalism?s beginnings does suggest that the Supreme Court?s recent ?federalism revolution? has been neither revolutionary nor about federalism in any historically informed sense. Instead, the Court?s federalism doctrine has unthinkingly replicated centuries-old debates, even as some justices claim to have divined the concept?s one true meaning.

As I discussed in a previous post, the central tenet of federal ideology as it emerged in the late eighteenth century was a conviction that multiple levels of government could ? indeed, should ? exist within a composite polity such as British North America. Federalism has had a core of stable meaning since its first American incarnation as a doctrine of colonial resistance to the power of Parliament, but that meaning has centered on a commitment to governmental multiplicity itself more than a vision of a particular distribution of governmental authority. We might term this the first lesson that the history of federalism offers for modern constitutional doctrine: a reminder that overlap, concurrence, and multiplicity are and have always been the background principles of the American federal republic, not a temporary way station to be visited on the way to a more perfect ? static, settled ? national structure. The states may be laboratories, but we should not assume that the experiment will be able to produce a magic structural formula.

Read the entire post here.

Full post as published by The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog on April 08, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0036 secs (from cache 10/31/26 06:17:20)