Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklysneak peek
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
From the first drafts of the upcoming edition:
For the Condemned
State v. Willie Herring, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 540;2011 Ohio 662 (Ohio 7th App 2/11/2010) ?Based on the foregoing, we must conclude that the trial court’s decision denying postconviction relief was an abuse of discretion. As the United States Supreme Court concluded in Rompilla, the undiscovered mitigating evidence in this case ” ‘ “might well have influenced the jury’s appraisal” ‘ ” of appellant’s culpability and the probability of a different sentence if counsel had presented the evidence is “‘sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome’” reached by the jury. (Internal citation omitted...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on February 21, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

A sneak peek at the cover of my next book
The First Sneak Peek at Solo Practice University
Everything You Need To Know About Structured Settlements
Reader Piqued By French Mutilations








