Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Law Of Criminal Defense
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Law Of Criminal DefenseAR: Convicition for meth possession with good mitigation only warranted reprimand
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
An Arkansas lawyer convicted of possession of a small quantity of meth, who went into rehab and AA on his own and accepted responsibility and voluntarily was drug tested and was regularly clean, was subject only a reprimand at most based on the record. No disbarment sanction was sought by the Director of the Committee on Professional Conduct. The 4-3 committee panel finding that his conviction was not prejudicial to the administration of justice was affirmed. Ligon v. Clouette, 2011 Ark. 68 (February 17, 2011). Note: This is maybe the first time Arkansas has not disbarred a lawyer for drugs, based on a good record for the lawyer.Full post as published by Law Of Criminal Defense on February 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

I am Accused of Meth Possession - What Should I Do - California Health and Safety Code Section 11377
OK, so maybe Missouri ISN'T the king of meth ...
Possible Jury Confusion over Meaning of "Actual" Meth Unlikely, Court Says








