Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Illinois Medical Malpractice BlogIllinois Medical Malpractice Watch: Alternatives To Taking Away Victim?s Rights
By Steven M. Levin and John J. Perconti
When we discuss tort ?reform? on this blog we are typically referring to the attempts by some to limit the damage awards reached by impartial, unbiased juries. Damage caps are likely the most discussed part of these so-called reforms. As we?ve attempted to show repeatedly, those caps act as an arbitrary infringement upon the rights of a jury to make decisions in our legal system. The ramifications of efforts to handcuff juries will be seen in all Illinois medical malpractices cases.
One facet of the debate that receives less attention that it warrants is the alternatives to arbitrary damage caps. As an article in the Huffington Post points out, even if all the dubious assertions made by proponents of tort reform are true (unlikely), there still exists superior alternatives actions to random caps on the awards provided by juries.
For example, even if there are some frivolous lawsuits?as claimed by doctors?why would that automatically mean that legitimate claims should be punished because of the frivolous? Turned on its head, the concept would mean that all doctors should receive lower Medicare payments because some doctors make fraudulent Medicare claims. The logic behind blanket restrictions on the rights of all victims fails.
Of course, there also remain other alternatives to solving this claimed crisis. Malpractice insurance premiums can be capped if doctors feel the rates are too high. There is no reason why the victims of the poor medical care should be the ones who are forced to suffer. The minimal discussion alternatives are telling, as insurance companies and other major interests are at least partially behind the effort to take away victim rights with damage caps. A clear motive behind the effort is less to reign in claimed excesses but to immunize certain sectors from the responsibility that comes with providing medical care to their community members.
Full post as published by Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog on February 15, 2011 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Gallbladder Surgery Errors Damage Bile Duct
X-ray Procedures Can Reduce Gall Bladder Surgery Error Rates
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
University of Illinois Medical Center
Potential $14 Million in Malpractice Settlements
Medical Malpractice
medical malpractice lawsuit.
Birthing Malpractice
Kaiser Permanente pays $3.2 million medical malpractice settlement.
Intentional Contamination
Northwestern Medical Center pays former orthopedic surgery $4 million medical malpractice settlement.
Medical Malpractice Suit Settled for $1.69 Million
Medical Malpractice Suit Settled for $1.69 Million
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award

How To Know If You Are A Victim Of Medical Malpractice
The Cushy Life of the Medical Malpractice Insurance Industry
Medical Malpractice: When you don't Get what you Pay for
Illinois Cap on Medical Malpractice Damages Unconstitutional
Illinois Supreme Court Delays Medical Malpractice Damages Cap Ruling
The Legacy of Feres: Marine Dies in Latest Act of Military Malpractice









