Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Alabama Consumer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: Alabama Consumer Blog"Supreme Court Hands Credit Card Companies a Big Win"
By M. Stan Herring
The BKBlog has posted an article about a recent Supreme Court case's outcome that ruled in the favor of creditors.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a creditor friendly decision in the case of Ransom v. Fia Card Services. At issues was the "ownership expense" deduction in the means test.The means test is a calculation used to determine whether a debtor has enough "disposable income" to afford a Chapter 13 bankruptcy repayment plan.
In the Ransom case, the debtor (Jason Ransom) claimed a means test deduction for both operation of a vehicle ($338 per month) and for ownership ($471 per month). The problem ? Mr. Ransom owned his vehicle free and clear.
The 8-1 decision held that if a debtor owns his vehicle then he can only claim a vehicle operation deduction, but not an ownership deduction. For Mr. Ransom, it means that for bankruptcy calculations it looks like he has an extra $471 that could be used to pay credit card companies in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
Chapter 13 cases last 5 years, so assuming Mr. Ransom has his car paid off it's probable that the car isn't new. If he had to replace his car in that 5 year period, he wouldn't have the funds to do it because of the money he's paying to fund his Chapter 13. It's quite unreasonable to assume that Mr. Ransom, or anybody for that matter, won't have an emergency in the next 5 years that will cost money.
The Supreme Court's decision ignores the realities of life. In the immediate near term the debtor may have $471 to pay towards his Chapter 13, but is it reasonable to expect that this "disposable" money will be there month after month? The Chapter 13 trustee will expect it, and these funds will come out in a payroll deduction. But I fear that even more Chapter 13 cases will fail when debtors lose their jobs because they do not have transportation or checks for mortgages will bounce because the funds were used for plumbing repairs or other emergencies.
The outcome of this case sends mixed messages to debtors who are about to enter into the process of bankruptcy. It doesn't encourage people to avoid debt, but rather rack up even more debt before filing for bankruptcy. For example, a debtor would be able to benefit from taking out a car title loan before filing bankruptcy because owing money on a car allows the person to claim it as an ownership expense and not be penalized for it.
Before you decide to file for bankruptcy, it's imperative that you consult with an attorney. If you have further questions or concerns about bankruptcy, feel free to contact us through our website or by calling 205-879-2447. You may also obtain a copy of our free book on stopping wrongful foreclosures and the problems of hidden fees by emailing us.
You can join our Facebook Fan Page - Alabama Consumer Protection Attorneys where we share useful information about the same types of issues that we cover in this blog.
You can also sign up for our free email newsletter sent out every Thursday morning - we cover topics such as the one in this post. We would love to include you! Just fill out the form below:
Full post as published by Alabama Consumer Blog on February 10, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Citibank
Will Repay $14 Million to Credit Card Customers
LOWE's
Faces Class Action for Credit Card Violations
Chase Bank
Faces Class Action over Credit Card Rates
JP Morgan Chase & Co
Faces Lawsuit Over Hikes in Credit Card Interest Rate
American Express
allegedly failed to properly inform customers of Blue Cash credit card offer components.
Wegmans Food Market
alleging the retailer revealed too much information on their credit and debit card receipts, violating the FACTA law, and leaving customers open to identity theft

Supreme Court Hands Credit Card Companies a Big Win
McCain, Obama, and Middle America
WSJ: Credit Card Companies Have "New Credit-Card Tricks"
Tricks credit card companies play
U.S. Supreme Court limits arbitration of credit card disputes
Caveat Emptor! New Credit Card Fees, Tactics on the Way









