Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities RegulationHouse Committeee Hearings Will Explore Impact of Dodd-Frank Derivatives Title
By Jim Hamilton
In the Chair's view, requiring companies that neither caused nor contributed to the financial crisis to be treated like banks will unnecessarily remove capital from the economy. Thus, the Committee seeks to ensure that the derivatives title of Dodd-Frank does not force valuable capital to sit on the sidelines or create a patchwork regulatory regime leaving market participants with conflicting regulatory mandates. Allowing either to happen would further erode America?s status as the global leader in the derivatives markets, warned Chairman Bachus, and prevent businesses from using derivatives as a way to manage risk, resulting in fewer jobs.
The Chair recognizes that derivatives contracts are essential financial instruments for many companies to manage interest rate, exchange rate, commodity fluctuations, and other business risks. Companies, large and small, use derivatives every day to protect themselves against unforeseen market volatility, commodity price increases or currency fluctuations. The Dodd-Frank Act requires that all derivatives contracts be cleared through a central clearinghouse and collateral posted for each contract.
The hearing will review the strengths and weaknesses of Title VII; the potential effects on U.S. competitiveness, job creation, and the overall U.S. economy; the likelihood of international harmonization of derivatives regulation; the consequences of the derivatives marketplace shifting from the United States to foreign markets; and the establishment of margin and capital requirements for end users who engage in the legitimate hedging of business risks.
Regulatory arbitrage and international financial regulatory harmonization has been a major concern of Chairman Bachus in that he fears that the European Union will not legislate as stringent a measure as Dodd-Frank. Earlier, he sent a letter to the SEC and the Fed expressing such concerns with regard to Dodd-Frank's Volcker provisions.
Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on February 09, 2011 (boomark / email).
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Women and the Law
Ttile IX
House Closing
Sealing a home sale
School House Abuse
Selwyn House School agrees to $5 million teacher molestation settlement.
Mirrors
Recalled Due to Impact and Laceration Hazards
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Nestle USA
Recalls Toll House Refrigerated Cookie Dough Products
Lighter Blamed in House Fire
Cricket Lighters settles $200,00 wrongful death lawsuit.

Dodd-Frank Forum: The Role of Derivatives in Failing Firms
Dodd-Frank, Systemic Risk, and Too Big to Fail
Columbia Journal of Tax Law Publishes Third Issue
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and the SEC: Profound Bits and Pieces
David Skeel on the Dodd-Frank Act







