ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> New York City Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: New York City Personal Injury Lawyer

FDA Orders Studies of TMJ Jaw Implants after Reports of Pain and Need for Removal

By Paul Napoli

ADVERTISEMENTS

February 7, 2011

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who approves and oversees the use of medical devices, has ordered three manufacturers of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) implants to conduct postmarket surveillance studies of these devices because of a high number of adverse event reports.

The FDA announced today that the agency has ordered TMJ Solutions, TMJ Medical and Biomet Microfixation to conduct studies to investigate an increased failure rate of the devices in which patients must have these devices removed or replaced due to pain or other reason. These companies make all the TMJ implants currently approved for use in the United States.

Physicians use TMJ implants in cases of jaw injury, arthritis, physical abnormality, mobility problems and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) to connect the lower jaw, or mandible, to the temporal bone of the skull.

'The FDA analyzed TMJ implant-related adverse event reports submitted between April 30, 2004 and Aug. 17, 2010,' the FDA said. 'The analysis described a substantial number of patients who had implants replaced within three years or less after implantation because of extreme pain. This is considerably shorter than the expected minimum five-year life span of the device, based on premarket mechanical testing.'

The TMJ implant postmarket surveillance studies performed by the manufacturers must address the following:

  • Time between initial implant and removal/replacement
  • Association between patient diagnosis and the timeframe between implant and removal/replacement
  • For replacement implants, the time between implant and subsequent removal/replacement
  • Reasons for removal/replacement of the implant
  • Associations between patient demographic and clinical data and the need or removal/replacement
  • Assessment of devices that have been removed from patients

After the review, the FDA will determine if labeling changes, additional preclinical and clinical testing requirements, or other regulatory actions, such as a recall, are necessary for TMJ implants.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Paul Napoli

Full post as published by New York City Personal Injury Lawyer on February 07, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)