Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportU.S. v. Smith (9th Cir. - March 31, 2008)
By Shaun Martin
I think this is a pretty darn good candidate to get taken en banc. It's a case in which the majority opinion arguably conflicts with a prior en banc decision. It's a case in which, at a minimum, the issue is close. And it's a case involving a model jury instruction that even the majority opinion concedes could probably be written a lot better.
This opinion was filed almost two full years (to the day) after oral argument. Don't be surprised if its shelf life is significantly less than that.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on March 31, 2008 (boomark / email).
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Citigroup Smith Barney
Settle Gender Class Action for $33 Million
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

Cohabitation - Finally a test for trial courts to apply
SEC Bars Father and Son from Industry for Insider Trading
5th Circuit to reconsider death penalty ruling
Patdown can be based on knowledge obtained prior to traffic stop
Consent to enter to talk was exceeded by officer looking in bathroom







