ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

Some Thoughts on Yesterday?s Judiciary Committee Hearing

By Randy Barnett

ADVERTISEMENTS
(Randy Barnett)

I have been too busy with page proofs for my forthcoming article in the NYU Journal of Law & Liberty to blog about yesterday?s Senate Judiciary Hearings. I suppose my one overall reaction was that if the Democrats, who called this hearing, hoped to blunt the momentum of the legal challenges by showing that the lawsuits had no merit, they failed in their objective. If anything, press coverage generally reflected the view that both sides made strong arguments, and that only the Supreme Court could settle the matter. Indeed, my impression is that the hearings served to advance the credibility of the challenges. The room was packed (they moved it to a larger room where Supreme Court nomination hearings are held) and I am told that the press table was full, which is unusual.

Substance aside, all the panelist were very satisfied with the civility of discussion among the five of us and with the Senators. I had expected a far more adversarial atmosphere, but with a few exceptions it was highly respectful. I was particularly struck by the cordiality and collegiality shown to all the witnesses by Senator Durbin. Not only did he genially greet each one of us beforehand and thank us individually afterwards, he paid close attention to everything each of us said, and what each fellow Senator said, for more than two hours of the hearing. I am sure he must have been zoning out more than a few times, but he really seemed genuinely to be trying to listen to everyone. I am not suggesting he was any more open to persuasion than anyone else, but that he was genuinely attentive throughout. And his final question to me, which could have been asked in a critical way, could not have been more courteous and considerate.

Anyway, you can see for yourself by watching the whole C*SPAN broadcast here (they don?t have an embedding code). If you wish to see only my opening statement, you can click on this:

For about 20 minuites before the hearing quite a few photographers were taking lots of pictures of everything the witnesses were doing. Here are a few I saw on-line:

Welcomed by Senator Durbin

Listening to Mike Carvin

Not such a great expression


Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on February 04, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0119 secs (new cache)