Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumFifth Circuit Opinion on the Constitutionality of Louisianna Advertising Rules
The Fifth Circuit's opinon is here and is definitely worth reading for anyone interested in the constitutionality of lawyer advertising rules. Ultimately, the Court affirmed the constitutionality of several provisions, but struck down as unconstitutional the following Louisianna Rules of Professional Conduct:
Rule 7.2(c)(1)(D), which prohibits "a reference or testimonial to past successes or results obtained, except as allowed in the Rule regulating information about a lawyer?s services provided upon request"
Rule 7.2(c)(1)(J), which prohibits the "portrayal of a judge or a jury, the portrayal of a lawyer by a non-lawyer, the portrayal of a law firm as a fictionalized entity, the use of a fictitious name to refer to lawyers not associated together in a law firm, or otherwise implies that lawyers are associated in a law firm if that is not the case"
and Rule 7.2(c)(10), which provides as follows: "Any words or statements required by these Rules to appear in an advertisement or unsolicited written communication must be clearly legible if written or intelligible if spoken aloud. All disclosures and disclaimers required by these Rules shall be clear and conspicuous. Written disclosures and disclaimers shall use a print size at least as large as the largest print size used in the advertisement or unsolicited written communication, and, if televised or displayed electronically, shall be displayed for a sufficient time to enable the viewer to easily see and read the disclosure or disclaimer. Spoken disclosures and disclaimers shall be plainly audible and spoken at the same or slower rate of speed as the other spoken content of the advertisement. All disclosures and disclaimers used in advertisements that are televised or displayed electronically shall be both spoken aloud and written legibly."
With regard to the last provision, the plaintiffs only challenged the portion relating to font size, speed of speech, and the requirement that a disclaimer be spoken and written in televised and electronic advertisements.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on January 31, 2011 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Comcast Corp.
alleging false advertising related to the speed of its Internet service.
Google
alleging that companies who used internet advertising to sell mobile content have overpaid for keywords.

7th Circuit Rules on SORNA Constitutionality
The ruling on the constitutionality of Va. Code 57-9
Eighth Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
"Second Circuit Rejects Most Of Attorney Advertising Rules"
Notable crack reduction opinion from the Second Circuit
8th Circuit Rules Section 526(a)(4) Unconstitutional as Applied to Attorneys









