Academic

Walsh on Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Virginia v. Sebelius

By Lawrence Solum

Kevin C. Walsh (University of Richmond - School of Law) has posted The Ghost that Slayed the Mandate on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Virginia v. Sebelius is a federal lawsuit in which Virginia seeks the invalidation of President Obama?s signature legislative initiative of healthcare reform. Virginia seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to vindicate a state statute declaring that no Virginia resident shall be required to buy health insurance. To defend this state law from the preemptive effect of federal law, Virginia contends that the federal legislation?s individual mandate to buy health insurance is unconstitutional. Virginia?s lawsuit is one of the most closely followed and politically salient federal cases in recent times. Yet neither the federal government nor any other legal commentator has previously identified the way in which the very features of the case that contribute to its political salience also require that it be dismissed for lack of statutory subject-matter jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has placed limits on statutory subject-matter jurisdiction over declaratory judgment actions in which a state seeks a declaration that a state statute is not preempted by federal law?precisely the relief sought in Virginia v. Sebelius. These limits insulate federal courts from the strong political forces surrounding lawsuits that seek federal court validation of state nullification statutes. This Essay identifies these heretofore neglected limits, shows why they demand dismissal of Virginia v. Sebelius, and explains why it is appropriate for federal courts to be closed to this type of suit.

Recommended & quite interesting.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on January 27, 2011 (boomark / email).