ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Kentucky

: Kentucky Cases

Std. of Review: By appellate court of arbitration award

ADVERTISEMENTS
<p>An appeal of an order confirming or denying confirmation of an<br />arbitration award is specifically provided for in KRS 417.220. The circuit court's judgment confirming the respective arbitration awards made in favor of both Dr. Jacob and Bluegrass in this case did not include any fact finding by the circuit court. The judgment states the following:<br />1.    That both parties['] motion to confirm the Arbitrator's Award is granted;<br />2.    That this Court further reaffirms its previous finding that the dispute between the parties arose from a contractual agreement which the parties had agreed to arbitrate;<br />3.    That all other issues involving the scope of arbitration, the issues to be arbitrated and the parties bound by the arbitration were properly addressed by the Arbitrator;<br />4.    That the Arbitrator's opinion was supported by substantial evidence;<br />5.    That this Court hereby confirms the Arbitrator's Clarified Award and pursuant to KRS 417.170 issues a Judgment in accordance with the Arbitrator's Award and Clarified Award;<br />6.    That this Judgment is final and appealable and there is no just cause for delay;<br />7.    That this Judgment shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum until paid;<br />8.    That [Dr.] Jacob's objection to confirmation is overruled; and<br />9.    That [Dr.] Jacob's counterclaim is dismissed.<br />Thus, our review on appeal for errors below is limited to questions of law which are reviewed de novo. Fischer v. MBNA America Bank, N.A., 248 S.W.3d 567 (Ky.App. 2007). Accordingly, we are not bound to defer to the circuit court's application of legal principles or law, including applicable contract law, in determining whether an arbitration agreement existed in this case. Conseco Fin. Serv. Corp. v. Wilder, 47 S.W.3d 335 (Ky.App. 2001).</p> <p>JACOB (ROBERT A.)<br /> VS.<br /> DRIPCHAK (PHILIP O.), ET AL.<br /> OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART, REVERSING IN PART, AND REMANDING WITH DIRECTIONS<br /> TAYLOR (PRESIDING JUDGE)<br /> COMBS (CONCURS) AND NICKELL (CONCURS)<br /> <a href="http://opinions.kycourts.net/coa/2008-CA-001157.pdf" target="_self">2008-CA-001157-MR</a><br /> TO BE PUBLISHED<br /> JEFFERSON <br />COA 1/21/2011</p>

Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on January 22, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)