Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Federal Civil Practice Bulletin
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Federal Civil Practice BulletinProf. Bales and Melanie Goff Post Article on the Applicability of Twombly to Affirmative Defenses on SSRN
The U.S. Supreme Court?s 2007 and 2009 decisions in Twombly and Iqbal radically altered the environment in which federal complaints are filed by creating a ?plausibility? requirement where the Federal Rules before required only a ?short and plain statement? providing ?notice? of a claim. The lower federal courts have just now begun to deal with the Twombly-Iqbal fallout. One of the issues that has arisen ? the issue addressed by this article ? is whether the new plausibility pleading standard applies only to plaintiffs? complaints, or whether it applies also to affirmative defenses raised in defendants? answers. This article argues that, regardless of whether the Twombly-Iqbal departure from notice pleading was wise, the new standard should be applied uniformly to all pleadings, because to do otherwise would even further uniquely and unfairly disadvantage plaintiffs.
The article may be downloaded at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1737805.
Full post as published by Federal Civil Practice Bulletin on January 19, 2011 (boomark / email).
Washington Post WPO Securities Fraud
Washington Post WPO
Washington Post 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Washington Post 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action

Bales and Goff on Applying Twombly and Iqbal to Affirmative Defenses
Goff and Bales on Orders to Compel Arbitration
Seiner on Twombly/Iqbal and Affirmative Defenses
"Courts split on affirmative defenses"
Seiner on Twombly, Iqbal, and the Affirmative Defense
Iqual and Twombly Impact Pleading Standards Under FRCP Rule 8







