ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

President Obama Orders Review to Identify and Repeal Outmoded and Burdensome Federal Regulations

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS
President Obama has issued an Executive Order requiring the periodic review of existing significant federal regulations in order to identify rules that may be outmoded, ineffective or excessively burdensome, and to streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned. This retrospective analyses, including supporting data, should be released online whenever possible.

Also, within 120 days of the date of the order, federal agencies must develop and submit to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs a preliminary plan under which the agency will periodically review its existing significant regulations to determine whether they should be streamlined, expanded, or repealed so as to make the agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives.

Noting that some industries face a significant number of regulations, some of which may be redundant, inconsistent, or overlapping, the Executive Order requires greater coordination across agencies to reduce these requirements and harmonize regulations. In developing regulations and identifying appropriate approaches, each agency must promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization. Each agency must also seek to identify means to achieve regulatory goals that are designed to promote innovation.

The Executive Order also speaks prospectively by requiring federal agencies to adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs and to tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives, taking into account, to the extent practicable, the costs of cumulative regulations. In choosing among alternative regulations, the regulator must select those approaches that maximize net benefits, including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity.

Also, to the extent feasible, the agency must specify performance objectives, rather than specifying the behavior or manner of compliance that regulated entities must adopt. Federal regulators must also identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including providing economic incentives to encourage the desired behavior, such as user fees or marketable permits, or providing information upon which choices can be made by the public.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on January 18, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)