Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: Kentucky CasesStd. of Review: Administrative agency's findings of fact and conclusions of law
By Michael Stevens
REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION:
When this Court reviews an administrative decision, ?if there is substantial evidence in the record to support an agency's findings, the findings will be upheld, even though there may be conflicting evidence in the record.? Kentucky Comm?n on Human Rights v. Fraser, 625 S.W.2d 852, 856 (Ky. 1981) (citation omitted). ?In weighing the substantiality of the evidence supporting an agency's decision, a reviewing court must hold fast to the guiding principle that the trier of facts is afforded great latitude in its evaluation of the evidence heard and the credibility of witnesses appearing before it.? Bowling v. Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, 891 S.W.2d 406, 409-10 (Ky. App. 1994) (citation omitted). If substantial evidence supports the agency?s decision, ?the reviewing court must then determine whether the agency applied the correct rule of law to its factual findings.? Id. at 410 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
FROM: Dept of Rev., Fin. and Adminstrative Cab. v. Wade; 2008-CA-001822, Published, 1/14/2011
----------------------------------
STANDARD OF REVIEW of ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
As the circuit court correctly noted, an administrative agency?s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, and its conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. ?The judicial standard of review of an unemployment benefit decision is whether the [Commission?s] findings of fact were supported by substantial evidence and whether the agency correctly applied the law to the facts.? Thompson v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission, 85 S.W.3d 621, 624 (Ky. App. 2002) (citations omitted).
1140. DENIAL OF UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS.
HUTCHISON (CAROLYN J.)
VS.
KENTUCKY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION, ET AL.
OPINION AFFIRMING
ACREE (PRESIDING JUDGE)
HENRY (CONCURS)(SENIOR STATUS JUDGE) AND ISAAC (CONCURS)
2010-CA-000032-MR
TO BE PUBLISHED
JEFFERSON
Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on January 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Trailers Contain Toxic Formaldehyde Fumes
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes

Ky Court Report Posts Jan. 17, 2011
Novell and SCO Agree on April 19th for Filing Findings and Conclusions
Annotating SCO's Findings of "Fact" and Conclusions of Law - Want to Help
Fat lady sings: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in Designer Skin v S & L Vitamins
Novell's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law







