Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: Kentucky CasesStd. of Review: Summary Judgment on Appeal
By Michael Stevens
The standards for reviewing a circuit court?s entry of summary judgment are well-established and were concisely summarized by this Court in Lewis v. B & R Corp., 56 S.W.3d 432 (Ky. App. 2001):
The standard of review on appeal when a trial court grants a motion for summary judgment is ?whether the trial court correctly found that there were no genuine issues as to any material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.? The trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, and summary judgment should be granted only if it appears impossible that the nonmoving party will be able to produce evidence at trial warranting a judgment in his favor. The moving party bears the initial burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists, and then the burden shifts to the party opposing summary judgment to present ?at least some affirmative evidence showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial.?
Id. at 436 (Internal footnotes and citations omitted). Because summary judgments involve no fact finding, we review the circuit court?s decision de novo. 3D Enters. Contr. Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metro. Sewer Dist., 174 S.W.3d 440, 445 (Ky. 2005); Blevins v. Moran, 12 S.W.3d 698, 700 (Ky. App. 2000).
FROM:
GRAFTON (MICHAEL J.), ET AL.
VS.
SHIELDS MINI MARKETS, INC.
OPINION REVERSING AND REMANDING
LAMBERT (SENIOR STATUS JUDGE) (PRESIDING JUDGE)
CAPERTON (CONCURS) AND WINE (CONCURS)
2009-CA-001862-MR
TO BE PUBLISHED
NELSON 1/14/2011
--------------------
SUMMARY JUDGMENT REVIEW ON APPEAL:
?The standard of review on appeal of a summary judgment is whether the trial court correctly found that there were no genuine issues as to any material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.? Scifres v. Kraft, 916 S.W.2d 779, 781 (Ky. App. 1996).
Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on January 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review

Brunet on Summary Judgment Safeguards
Ky Court Report Posts Jan. 17, 2011
Nelson on Summary Judgment and the Progressive Constitution
NC SCT Reiterates: No Assignments Of Error Needed From Summary Judgment







